<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sisyphus @ Mar 20 2009, 09:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>Damn. You must have access to Obama's teleprompter. Are you 45 degrees to the right, or the left? Fact is, some employees work, and some don't. $45,000 is a hell of a bet - even in Vegas - those of us who own businesses and hire people, understand that risk. And we're not going to continue to take it when barak redistributes what we earn to the lazy fat asses sitting on the back porch smoking drugs.Let me see if I get this straight...
You don't want to "risk" the $45K cost of training/compensating a new employee because the government "steals" more than half* of your additional incremental "profit" (by definition, revenue generated by that new employee in excess your costs) associated with that new employee???? Unless something is missing from your scenario, you're still better off economically than you would be if you hadn't hired this person. Where are you going to get a better ROI on your $45K? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face...
BTW, does that 12 months of training factor in all of YOUR lost productivity pissing & moaning on the Internet about the raw deal you're getting???
* Not quite sure how 39% on Corporate Taxable Income > $100K & < $335K (highest current US corporate tax rate I could find) equals = "more than half" but - for purposes of this discussion - I'll take your world for it...[/b]