Quote Originally Posted by Lena Duvall View Post
Boom! I wholeheartedly agree. In addition to the points you and Kimberly addressed about clients possibly unknowingly outing an SB's IRL name and contact, there's this...

It's funny because ECCIE went to such great lengths to appease the payment processors and attempt to limit some of their liability. But there are so many ways they are exposed. And allowing men to post reviews which partially function as ads on non-age verified people, meanwhile a provider can't post herself if she didn't submit age verification seems very precarious.
Uhhh, EXACTLY! But, we get a year ban for outing a fake name! Ignorant!

- - - Updated - - -

Quote Originally Posted by Phoenixx View Post



not surprised!

they review anyone they pay...


Anyone.






And, they're worried about providers lol. Like hello idiot, you reviewed a 16 year old and included a photo. ������