Ok, so I have seen another LA girl worth mentioning now; Julie, so I'll put her in the mix:

5. Vicky: Great service 9/10, looks so so 5 or 6/10, age probably early 40's, photo now gone but I'd say a 8/10 HIGH BS rating when there was one, Overall rating: 7/10
6. Yuri: Great Service 8/10, looks good 6 or 7/10, age probably mid to late 30's, 7/10 High BS rating, overall rating: 6/10
4. Boa: So so service 6 or 7/10, looks very nice in my opinion 8 or 9/10 late 20's to mid 30's, 3 /10 low/moderate BS rating, she is a touch older in person but not much, overall rating: 6/10
7. Rebecca: Good service 7/10, looks meh 5/10, age probably late 40's... maybe later, 9/10 HIGH BS rating, I think it oddly is her or parts of her photos, but HIGHLY Tampered with, buyer beware, overall rating: 4/10
3. Emmy: So so service 6/10, looks great 8 or 9/10, age probably mid 20's to late 20's, 2 or 3/10 low BS rating, overall rating: 6/10
2. Abby: Great service 9/10, looks good 7 or 8/10, age probably late 20's to early 30's, 0/10 ZERO BS rating (unheard of for them! lol), Overall rating: 8/10
1. Julie: Great service 9/10, looks good 8.5/10, age probably early to mid 30's, 2 or 3/10 low BS rating good photos, but she is either that girl or just as pretty I think, overall rating: 8.5/10

I feel the need to visit Maple and Red to get them on this. Remember, the first number is my number, who I'd see first or go back to now given the chance. The second number is service, so IOP, 'naughtiness factor', quality of skills. The third thing is my estimate of their age (could be way off of course). The fourth number is my "BS" rating; basically are the pictures on the site that girl, do they look like the girl, are they photo-shopped, yada yada. The last one is the overall rating, which might not relate as closely as you think to my first number as that has a personal preference part to it.